Please Help Clipster VS DOM

[Cooller89]

How to remove identification tools? information is written in CPL and PKL files repeatedly

Actually that needs some changes to DCP-o-matic; I'm working on it ... I'll let you know when it's done.

Thank you very much, I will wait with impatience

[Cooller89]

Can you tell us more about your relation to this studio? What were you doing for them, what are they supposed to do with your DCP in Clipster? Are they in your home country, do they speak your native language?

- Carsten

I made an OV package for them and a VF package with subtitles. Both packets are encrypted. I sent them these packets and DKDM for their station. What they should do with the packages, they don’t tell me

[Carsten]

If they use a Clipster, why didn't they make these packages themselves? Just trying to figure out why they get on you about the software you used...

- Carsten

[carl]

Thank you very much, I will wait with impatience

DCP-o-matic 2.15.81 has a new preferences panel "Identifiers"; if you go in there and change everything to something suitable (but don't leave anything empty) it should mean that the resulting DCP has no clear identifiers of openjpeg/libdcp/DCP-o-matic in it.

It doesn't mean that it's impossible to tell that the DCP was made by DCP-o-matic, but it should be much harder.

Unfortunately you will need to re-make your DCP. You can do that from the same DCP-o-matic projects you already have, but you need to delete the video folders from inside your DCP-o-matic projects before you start, otherwise DCP-o-matic will re-use the old video files (with the unwanted metadata).

[Cooller89]

If they use a Clipster, why didn't they make these packages themselves? Just trying to figure out why they get on you about the software you used...

- Carsten

I do not know that

[Cooller89]

Thank you very much, I will wait with impatience

DCP-o-matic 2.15.81 has a new preferences panel "Identifiers"; if you go in there and change everything to something suitable (but don't leave anything empty) it should mean that the resulting DCP has no clear identifiers of openjpeg/libdcp/DCP-o-matic in it.

It doesn't mean that it's impossible to tell that the DCP was made by DCP-o-matic, but it should be much harder.

Unfortunately you will need to re-make your DCP. You can do that from the same DCP-o-matic projects you already have, but you need to delete the video folders from inside your DCP-o-matic projects before you start, otherwise DCP-o-matic will re-use the old video files (with the unwanted metadata).

Carl, thank you very much, I will try this version

[Cooller89]

Thank you very much, I will wait with impatience

DCP-o-matic 2.15.81 has a new preferences panel "Identifiers"; if you go in there and change everything to something suitable (but don't leave anything empty) it should mean that the resulting DCP has no clear identifiers of openjpeg/libdcp/DCP-o-matic in it.

It doesn't mean that it's impossible to tell that the DCP was made by DCP-o-matic, but it should be much harder.

Unfortunately you will need to re-make your DCP. You can do that from the same DCP-o-matic projects you already have, but you need to delete the video folders from inside your DCP-o-matic projects before you start, otherwise DCP-o-matic will re-use the old video files (with the unwanted metadata).

Carl, I also noticed that MediaInfo does not correctly show the resolution if the packet is encrypted


как добавить фото на форум

[carl]

OK, I added a bug for that.