2.15.72 64-bit Error

Anything and everything to do with DCP-o-matic.
Post Reply
scozz76
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 10:13 am

2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by scozz76 »

2.15.72 64-bit
See attached JPG
Reinstalling didn't fix the problem. Rolling back to 2.15.71 did fix the problem.
Attachments
2.15.72 64-bit.JPG
2.15.72 64-bit.JPG (20.28 KiB) Viewed 8152 times
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by carl »

Oh dear :( I'll fix that now, thanks very much for the heads-up!
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by carl »

Should be better in 2.15.73.
scozz76
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 10:13 am

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by scozz76 »

Ahhhh, that's better :D
scozz76
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 10:13 am

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by scozz76 »

Oops, I tell a lie.

When importing a file or opening a saved session.

15:19:19: can't open file 'C:\Program Files\DCP-o-matic 2\link.png' (error 0: the operation completed successfully.)
15:19:19: Failed to load image from file "C:\Program Files\DCP-o-matic 2\link.png".
15:19:19: can't open file 'C:\Program Files\DCP-o-matic 2\link.png' (error 0: the operation completed successfully.)
15:19:19: Failed to load image from file "C:\Program Files\DCP-o-matic 2\link.png".
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by carl »

:oops: will fix...
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by carl »

Hopefully this time!
scozz76
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 10:13 am

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by scozz76 »

So far, so good.
What happened to 2.15.74? :)
Carsten
Posts: 2648
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by Carsten »

Carl is faster than his shadow...
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2338
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: 2.15.72 64-bit Error

Post by carl »

.74 had the same problem on Linux :shock:
Post Reply