DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Anything and everything to do with DCP-o-matic.
Post Reply
chinshort
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am

DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by chinshort »

Hello!

Converting ProRes4444 to DCP, and facing some issues with the brightness levels/gamma(?)
Not sure if this question has been answered before.
I was wondering if this drop in brightness is normal?

Comparing VLC snapshots on Premiere Pro with scopes.

My source settings are as follows:

Video
ID: 1
Format : ProRes
Format version: Version 1
Format profile: 4444
Codec ID : ap4h
Duration: 35 s 833 ms
Bit rate mode: Constant
Bit rate : 220 Mb/s
Width: 1 998 pixels
Height: 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio: 1.85:1
Frame rate mode: Constant
Frame rate: 24.000 FPS
Color space: YUV
Chroma subsampling: 4:4:4
Scan type: Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame): 4.247
Stream size: 939 MiB (99%)
Writing library: adb0
Language: English
Encoded date: UTC 2023-04-10 08:43:03
Tagged date: UTC 2023-04-10 08:43:03
Color primaries: BT.709
colour_primaries_Original: BT.709
Transfer characteristics: BT.709
transfer_characteristics_Origi : BT.709
Matrix coefficients: BT.709
matrix_coefficients_Original: BT.709

My output settings is as follows (as attached):
A1 DOM settings.PNG
A1 DOM settings.PNG (13.97 KiB) Viewed 627 times
Colour: Rec709
Range Video (MPEG, 16-235)

Source:
A4 Source Levels PP.PNG
A4 Source Levels PP.PNG (1.01 MiB) Viewed 627 times
Export:
A5 Export Levels PP.PNG
A5 Export Levels PP.PNG (1.11 MiB) Viewed 627 times
Carsten
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by Carsten »

You should try rec.1886 (different gamma) in DCP-o-matic.

Had a few discussions about rec.709 vs. rec.1886 on the forum before, e.g.

https://dcpomatic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9460#p9460

https://dcpomatic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=9132#p9132

Also, VLC snapshots are useful, but it's not a calibration reference.
chinshort
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by chinshort »

I've actually tried different gamma levels and they all result in a similar drop in the brightness levels.

Premiere Timeline:
PPstack.PNG
PPstack.PNG (6.43 KiB) Viewed 615 times
Levels Difference:
DCP-Levels.png
DCP-Levels.png (581.06 KiB) Viewed 615 times
Not sure if I'm doing something wrong on export?
Carsten
Posts: 2663
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
Location: Germany

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by Carsten »

This is not a proper calibrated roundtrip workflow, using three different applications, each which it's own color conversion.

You should probably also export the DCP from DCP-omatic as Prores.

Not sure what you are trying to achieve. You need to take your DCP to a calibrated cinema in order to judge proper levels.
chinshort
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by chinshort »

Just trying to find out why there's a drop in brightness levels after the export.

Will try to export the DCP from DOM as ProRes and give it a go.

Will update after! Thanks!
chinshort
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by chinshort »

Update on this,

Source ProRes4444, exported to DCP from DCP-O-Matic(DOM), put DCP back into DOM, exported ProRes4444 from DCP generated from DOM, and the drop in brightness level is present in the ProRes4444 export as well.
carl
Site Admin
Posts: 2355
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by carl »

Source ProRes4444, exported to DCP from DCP-O-Matic(DOM), put DCP back into DOM, exported ProRes4444 from DCP generated from DOM, and the drop in brightness level is present in the ProRes4444 export as well.
What are you using for "video range" for the ProRes444 file when you make the first DCP in this test?
chinshort
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2023 6:43 am

Re: DCP Export Brightness Levels Lower (?)

Post by chinshort »

For this test - it is Video (MPEG, 16-235)
Post Reply