Odd QC rejection - Content Version in CPL

[worldofcrap]

Just had a DCP fail QC at a major distributor with yet another baffling error. I can never tell how seriously to take these errors, since I’m almost certain they’re just arbitrarily making up new rules at this point.

This is an IOP DCP built with a version that’s about a month old.

Error - cpl=46f32f77-0239-42dc-bb35-a941924dc029; Content Version's Label Text child element is missing
Description
Content Version requires both an Id and Label Text child element.
Remediation
Create a new CPL file updating the Content Version to include both Id and Label text elements with valid values.

Is thus something I need to be concerned about? Thanks!

[carl]

Could you attach or email the cpl...xml file from your DCP? carl@dcpomatic.com

[worldofcrap]

Thanks a ton for your help! Sent to you via email.