Yup, there is an issue. Barco ICMP is on 1.4.3.7.
I tried first with 2.14.57 on our cinema windows machine, with an encrypted SMPTE DCP. Ingest of both DCP and KDM, no issues, Barco properties dialog says: 'Valid, OK to play', and it does indeed play.
Then I tried it with 2.15.171, which I still have on my Mac. I created an encrypted SMPTE DCP and set all necessary metadata, basically, all language to DE. Barco ingested DCP and KDM fine, properties dialog says 'Valid, Ok to play' - but when I try to play, I get this error:
As a first try, I can make both DCPs (2.14.57 and 2.15.171) available to you, they are small. Both do work in DCP-o-matic player 2.15.180 with local selfDKDMs, the one done with 2.15.171 get's no validator complaints. I can also try to generate a KDM towards our Sony and try it there. I may get a chance to access another ICMP on Monday which I can/will update to the most recent software version.
Invalid CPL signature on Barco
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:15 pm
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
hi carl,
Maybe it's a problem with the version of openSSL which produces a wrong cipher value string, or because of a newer version of libxmlsec.
Maybe it's a problem with the version of openSSL which produces a wrong cipher value string, or because of a newer version of libxmlsec.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
Great - that's the same error as the other reporter was seeing. If I can compare the good and bad DCPs that would be a good start. If there's nothing obvious from there we might have to go back through 2.15.x to work out where it was introduced.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
I guess if you have time it would also be interesting to try the latest test version just in case this is caused by the empty AnnotationText tags for some bizarre reason.
I could just about imagine the signer code discarding the empty tag before signing, or something.
The latest test is called 2.16.0 as I just got it all prepared for release on Monday
I could just about imagine the signer code discarding the empty tag before signing, or something.
The latest test is called 2.16.0 as I just got it all prepared for release on Monday
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
I added dropbox links to the two DCPs on Mantis.
I COULD update the Barco to the very latest version, but I would not do it immediately. Nothing in the recent Barco version history says something that could be relevant to this problem. But very often 'smaller' bugs simply are not mentioned there and are cleaned out silently.
I am now creating another DCP with the most current test release, using the same project file and settings.
I COULD update the Barco to the very latest version, but I would not do it immediately. Nothing in the recent Barco version history says something that could be relevant to this problem. But very often 'smaller' bugs simply are not mentioned there and are cleaned out silently.
I am now creating another DCP with the most current test release, using the same project file and settings.
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
Same problem with 2.16.0
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
BTW - I tried to play all three (2.14.57/2.15.171/2.16.0) encrypted DCPs on our Sony - but when ingesting the KDMs, those created with 2.15.171 and 2.16.0 are rejected as invalid (no further details). I am quite sure I did everything right, but will try to recreate these DCPs and KDMs again later.
The encrypted DCP and KDM created with 2.14.57 ingest and play okay on both the Barco and the Sony.
Carl - I can't find the 'empty AnnotationText tags' bug on Mantis in the 'Resolved' bug list - do you have a link?
The encrypted DCP and KDM created with 2.14.57 ingest and play okay on both the Barco and the Sony.
Carl - I can't find the 'empty AnnotationText tags' bug on Mantis in the 'Resolved' bug list - do you have a link?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
The other Sony bug is here.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
Re: Invalid CPL signature on Barco
Oh dear - maybe you're seeing the other mystery Sony bug. I'll look at your links as soon as I can and see if anything is obvious.BTW - I tried to play all three (2.14.57/2.15.171/2.16.0) encrypted DCPs on our Sony - but when ingesting the KDMs, those created with 2.15.171 and 2.16.0 are rejected as invalid (no further details). I am quite sure I did everything right, but will try to recreate these DCPs and KDMs again later.