I've rendered the image to jpeg2000, it's dci flat 2k compliant, bitrate 180, but why does the dom re-encode it? Although it should be able to use this jpeg2000 immediately without re-encoding.
I remember the old version used to be faster when using jpeg2000 j2c from daVinci resolve.
then computing digest It's much slower than before.
Jpeg2000 encoding to be Jpeg2000???
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2023 4:18 am
- Location: Ratchaburi, Thailand
Jpeg2000 encoding to be Jpeg2000???
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2548
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 2:53 pm
Re: Jpeg2000 encoding to be Jpeg2000???
Are you sure it's re-encoding it? Are you getting 45fps when encoding J2K?
Can you give more details about what you mean by "before"? For example, a version number where it's quicker?
Can you give more details about what you mean by "before"? For example, a version number where it's quicker?
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2023 4:18 am
- Location: Ratchaburi, Thailand
Re: Jpeg2000 encoding to be Jpeg2000???
Sorry, but in fact it's a little slower than copying. But it must be admitted that the file is more stable than the old version.
-
- Posts: 2804
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:11 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Jpeg2000 encoding to be Jpeg2000???
Source and new DCP on the same drive? Internal or external drive?
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2023 4:18 am
- Location: Ratchaburi, Thailand